gre写作的丢分点盘点

你知道你在哪里丢了gre写作分数吗?下面小编就和大家分享gre写作的丢分点盘点，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。

gre写作的丢分点盘点

1. gre写作丢分点之论证不足

gre考试写作Argument即驳论文，需要对题干进行全面的审查，找到原文中论述的一些逻辑漏洞加以攻击。查找漏洞，提出论点，阐述论证确立自己的观点的过程就叫做论证。换句话说，论证就是用一个或一些已知为真的判断确定另一个判断的真实性的思维过程。所谓论证过程，就是用严格的逻辑规则由论据得出论点的过程。所以，如果论点的得出过程理由不够充分，或论点总结不够准确，这篇文章的论证过程就是不严谨的。

gre写作虽然主要是针对逻辑错误进行攻击和论证，但只是理论上的论述会显得文章死板，不易理解，适当的举例会让论证显得更加具有说服力，同时也能丰富文章内容，提升文章的可读性。

2. gre写作丢分点之缺少论据

gre写作要求考生论证充分，论据有力，考生基本上都能够针对找出的逻辑错误进行充分论证，但是缺少例子和细节，文章说理就会显得十分苍白无力，所以gre写作分数不高，也有可能是这份不造成的。

论据就是为论点提供的证据，通过论据，可以加深论点的准确性，使论点更加准确，更加能够让人信服。所以考生要在文章中尽量做到细节的丰富和量化，很多时候细致的例子能够弥补遣词造句上的不足。具体应做到以下几点：

1)论据要来源于生活，要具有生动的论述效果。不能过于空洞，也不能脱离现时，否则就失去了举例的意义。

2)要客观表达。虽然来源于身边社会，但不能主观臆断。

3) gre写作中举例常见的表达方式如for example,/for instance, (后加句子)Such as/ like (后加词组)，Take... as an example, A case in point is that...等。

3. gre写作丢分点之逻辑混乱

考生在进行gre写作之前，一定要先把题干弄明白，准确找出题干中的逻辑错误，然后再进行下一步的写作，这对于把握gre写作的文章内容和逻辑思维非常重要。考生需要审好题，审清题在很大程度上关系到整篇文章的成败，绝不可以掉以轻心。不仅要仔细研究题目，还要结合gre写作常见的逻辑七宗罪进行仔细分析。首先要明确文章要写的内容，这是保证整篇文章切题的关键;其次，确定文章所需的主语人称，人称混乱是中国考生常犯的一个错误;第三，注意文章对动词的时态、语气的特殊要求。

gre写作更注重的是文章的整体感觉，从备考指导中的高分作文范例可以看出，即使整个论述只有1条主线，只要前后联接得自然流畅，并能一步一步引导读者向结论靠近，就是好文章。增强gre写作的逻辑性考生可以从以下几个方面入手：

1) 掌控题目中的逻辑链。这是gre写作的根本，也是前提。

2)根据逻辑漏洞的个数列出文章的主要提纲。这样既能体现出文章结构的清晰，又能在内容上体现出详略得当，顺序合理。

3)根据所列提纲进行逻辑论证时重中之重。

GRE作文范文：如何避免偏激

Most people often look for similarities, even between very different things, and even when it it is unhelpful or harmful to do so. Instead, a thing should be considered on its own terms: we should avoid the tendency to compare it to something else.

GRE作文范文参考：

In the age of accelerating changes, the eagerness to understand things in an effective and equally efficient way is more than ever. Although all kinds of complex techniques, skills and equipments helpful for understanding and studying the objects are easily accessible to people, the basic strategies stay the same as before: one is starting from similarities and the other from distinction. From my personal point of view, only by using the two in proper proportion and order can one achieve his/her goal to understand a thing.

Looking for similarities is a proper starting point. When we first meet something new,we need to clarify its basic attributes, finding similarites with other familiar things and classify it according to those attributes. Classification according to similaties is of great assistance to provide us with an outline, basic knowledge which we can base further investigation upon. Although things in contemporary age represent themselves in various forms and styles, similarities exist in any pair as long as certain perspective can be found. For instance, Bookcase and window are so different that at first glance, one

may not be able to find the similarities, or even such an effort seems to be meaningless. Yet, they are both part of a house, something that must be taken into consideration when decorating or refurnishing the house. Such a comparison would be helpful for us to realize that “buy” and “sell” are two basic operation we can have upon window even though we have no idea what window is made of, how it is produced or what its function is.What’s more, looking for similarities not only refer to the object itself, but the relationship with others. Similar relationships helps people understand things in groups or pairs using the strategy: analogy. Analogy is especially useful when the charactertistics of a relationship rather than the objects themselves are the focus of understanding and when similar relationships are known and objects unknown. For example, if told that the relationship between window and ASVE is similar to that between book and read, one can safely guess that ASVE is the operation people can take on window although ASVE stays an unknown action.

Definitely, mere similarity usually exclude the distinctive characteristics of a thing. We need to investigate its own terms for deeper understanding. Within the rough outline sketched by similarity, a more detailed and well-articulated picture can be drawn by grasping own terms of a thing. Still take window as an example. From careful observation, we know that it is transparent, it consists of different chemical materials, it performs the function as to protect privacy, to preserve desirable temperature indoor, and sometimes to prevent rains and snows from going inside. Deeper and further understanding of window can only be gained when we take its own terms besides those it shares with bookcase into consideration.

In the newly development software engineering model named Object-oriented model,the strategy “similarity first and differences later” functions as the core and focus of the whole model. Objects sharing common points are put into same “classes” and common points are processed together, later they are defined, discussed and processed respectively according to their own characteristics. This method greatly reduces the repetive time and energy spent over and over again on similar, if not utterly same, terms. Translated into daily life, starting from similarites for a quick outline and transferring to grasp distinctive characteristics for deeper understanding isthe approach we should always bear in mind when hoping to understand a thing with effectiveness and efficiency.

GRE作文范文：想法付诸行动的困难

Practicality is now our great idol, which all powers and talents must serve.Anything that is not obviously practical has little value in today's world.

GRE作文范文参考：

In today’s society idealism seems to become an ideology that is marginalized and practicality is our great idol, thus, the speaker asserts that anything that is not practical bears little value. I admit that being practical is the wide-accepted dogma in order to survive in this world, but by going too far to claim that anything that is not practical has little value is against the empirical observation as well as the general stimulus that push the human society forward.

Admittedly, practicality has become a cult in today’s society. Too often do we hear people talk about being practical whenever they come to make important decisions or choose between several alternatives. The deep-rooted cause underlying this phenomenon is that with the development of modern society, the emphasis is placed more on financial gaining, quick fame, sensible choice and so forth. Our society is rather stable compared with that of the last century when war, violence, human right movements has become the symbol of that period. People are enjoying this peaceful environment with less crucial missions rested upon them and as a result, they shift from idealism to struggle for the common well being of mankind to the practical concept of individual achievement.

This ideology has its merits since after all the disaster and upheaval that our human race has undergone, it is judicious to focus on the economic aspect of things in order to tackle the most important social problems such as poverty, hunger and environmental problems which all deserve us to sit down and work out practical solutions. On the personal level, being practical is how a person would possibly succeed in his career or personal life. One is likely to make sensible decisions for his education and job choice on the basis of practical consideration of his own strength and weakness and careful analysis of the prospect of research direction and job market. Even those in power and intellects need to consider practically since hasty decision built upon pure ideal meditation would hardly find its way in the modern society and is doom to failure.

Agreeing with the speaker that practicality has become the great idol in our society, I am strongly against his point that anything that is not practical has little value. Even in today’s society, idealism is by no means relegated to the place of total neglect and disregard. For one thing, in history, so much achievement is the outcome of several generations’ struggle such as fighting for equality for women, human rights movement,etc. In today’s society, practicality is the way we can obtain our goal but idealism offers the philosophical explanation of why we should set this as our goal and the clear the ultimate value of our pursuing. What is more, by totally fixed one's eyes upon the practical aspect of things, we face the danger of neglecting one important part of our pursuit, that is the mental enjoyment brought out by idealism. If we have a clear goal set in mind and put practical endeavor at the same time, the result would be more satisfactory and valuable.

To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as the wide acceptance of practicality is considered. Being practical is the tenet of modern society and it does shed light on the wise way of doing things and obtaining goals, no matter in the personal or social level.But the speaker goes too far by claiming that it is the only valuable ideology in society.I am strongly against this idea since in history or at present, we human beings still need the philosophical explanation to clear our goal and to provide motivation. In this aspect, idealism would never be replaced with pure practical consideration. Otherwise,human society will be replete with insensible people directed by economic profit and quick fame and recognition.