2020GRE阅读考试三招搞定

如何用三招搞定GRE阅读的呢?今天小编给大家带来了GRE阅读考试三招搞定，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE阅读考试三招搞定

一、新GRE阅读3招精华：

对付GRE阅读难度层面上的阅读，永远都是先读文章后解题。记的东西要有侧重，要trenchant，主要有：

新观点的内容及出现处，TS，强对比之处，最高级及惟一性出现处(若有，大都没有，其实只要有个印象，哪个环节有这种内容，没有的话选项中一有这类词统统画X!)，人名第一次出现处，大列举处。想，是读完一段的必要工作，想三个问题：该段说了什么内容，回忆TS，作者为什么这样说，作者对这里的看法态度如何。

这三部曲是解题最根本的东西，无论何时，何地，何等危急情况都不可省。

二、新GRE阅读高分方法：

1.题目类型固定或所涉及考点为已做标记范畴

1)问事物之间的关系，定位到同时标记这两个事物的地方。

2)问作者态度，定位到有态度词标记的地方。

3)问事物的缺陷，直接定位到标记缺陷处。

4)问文章大意类的主旨题定位与TS

5)问全文focus的特征，首先到TS处定位。

6)问文章结构、段落作用、行文方法类的主旨题定位于SE。

7)问作者举某个例子的目的，或者作者引用一段文字为了说明什么，这类就写作用意提问的题目一般定位于例子或者引述文字的上文。

8)提干句以IF结尾的改进型或取非题，定位在原文缺陷处或者有unless的句子。

9)如果题目为EXCEPT题，可以先看看原文的标记中有没有列举内容;如果有，很可能是答案所在。

2.题干有特征词的题目

1)最高级、比较级、数字、以大写字母开头的专有名词、年代、特殊历史时期、引号、斜体字。

2)选项标志词与题干核心词双重定位

3)段落定位

GRE阅读材料练习：心理情绪竟然还与家具有关

CLEARLY, a person’s decisions are determined by circumstances.

显然，任何人在做决策的时候都受决策时的周遭环境所影响。

Just how closely they are determined, however, has only recently become apparent.

但具体来说会造成多大的影响直到最近才有了一个较为清晰的解释。

Experiments conducted over the past few years have revealed that giving someone an icy drink at a party leads him to believe he is getting the cold shoulder from fellow guests, that handing over a warm drink gives people a sense of warmth from others,

在过去几年进行的一系列实验中，有一个实验发现在聚会中，给客人提供冷饮会让他有不受旁边人待见的感觉倾向，相反，提供温水等有温度的饮料会让他们感觉到周围人的温暖。

and—most astonishingly—that putting potential voters in chairs which lean slightly to the left causes them to become more agreeable towards policies associated with the left of the political spectrum.

最让人惊奇的是，在另外一个关于潜在选民的实验中，让一个没有立场的潜在选民，坐在椅子上并微微向左边靠，他会更加认同与左派相似的政治立场。

The latest of these studies also looks at the effect of furniture.

这一系列实验最近将他们的目标转向了家具，研究家具对人的影响。

It suggests that something as trivial as the stability of chairs and tables has an effect on perceptions and desires.

他们假设许多不被人注意到的细节例如桌椅的稳定性会影响到人们对于其他事物的看法和愿望。

The study was conducted by David Kille, Amanda Forest and Joanne Wood at the University of Waterloo, in Canada, and will be published soon in Psychological Science.

这份研究是由David Kille，Amanda Forest以及滑铁卢大学的Joanne Wood一同完成的，即将在《心理科学》杂志上发表。

Mr Kille and his collaborators asked half of their volunteers to sit in a slightly wobbly chair next to a slightly wobbly table while engaged in the task assigned.

在实验中，他们选取了47个处于单身的大学本科生，将他们分为两组，一半学生在实验中坐在一张会摇晃的桌子旁一张会摇的椅子上，

The others were asked to sit in chairs next to tables that looked physically identical, but were not wobbly.

另外一半则是坐在外表相似却非常稳的椅子上。

Once in their chairs, participants were asked to judge the stability of the relationships of four celebrity couples:

研究人员给两组学生展示四组夫妇的照片：

Barack and Michelle Obama, David and Victoria Beckham, Jay-Z and Beyoncé, and Johnny Depp and Vanessa Paradis.

奥巴马和米歇尔，维多利亚和贝克汉姆，Jay-Z和碧昂斯，强尼戴普和vanessa paradis，

They did this by rating how likely they thought it was, on a scale of one to seven, that a couple would break up in the next five years.

然后让学生们给四对夫妇的情感稳定性打分—从一分到七分，他们未来五年离婚/分手的几率，

A score of one meant extremely unlikely to dissolve.

一分代表几乎不可能分开，

A score of seven meant extremely likely to dissolve.

七分代表十分可能分手。

After they had done this, they were asked to rate their preferences for various traits in a potential romantic partner.

接下来，调查者让两组学生分别对一系列理想配偶的特征进行打分—量表上给出一系列特征，

Traits on offer included some which a pilot study indicated people associate with a sense of psychological stability, some that are associated with psychological instability and some with no real relevance to instability or stability.

依旧是一分到七分，一分代表一点也不喜欢这样子的七分代表大爱。量表上设置的特征，有些与追求稳定相关联，有些与追求不稳定相关联，有一些是随机挑选的特质，三类特征交错放置。

Participants rated the various traits on another one-to-seven scale, with one indicating not at all desirable and seven meaning extremely desirable.

其中关于追求稳定的一些特质包括是否值得信赖，是否可靠。而追求不稳定的特质包括是否自发性强，或是具有探险精神。

The results reveal that just as cold drinks lead to perceptions of social conditions being cold, tinkering with feelings of physical stability leads to perceptions of social instability.

调查结果就像之前那个聚会不要请人喝冷饮的调查一样，在身体感受到不稳定状态的时候会使得心理上更加倾向于感受到社交中的不稳定因子。

Participants who sat in wobbly chairs at wobbly tables gave the celebrity couples an average stability score of 3.2 while those whose furniture did not wobble gave them 2.5.

摇椅上的人给那四对夫妇打得分数是3.2，比另外一组高出0.7，越高分数代表越可能分开。

What was particularly intriguing, though, was that those sitting at wonky furniture not only saw instability in the relationships of others but also said that they valued stability in their own relationships more highly.

最有趣的还不是这里，最有趣的是这些坐在摇晃家具上的人不仅更倾向于看见他人关系中不稳定的因素，也倾向于更加重视追求自己与他人关系中的稳定因子。

They gave stability-promoting traits in potential romantic partners an average desirability score of 5.0, whereas those whose tables and chairs were stable gave these same traits a score of 4.5.

他们在后一个实验中对理想配偶的稳定特质重视程度的打分平均是5.0，比另外一组高出0.5，

The difference is not huge, but it is statistically significant.

虽然数字上的差异不是很大，但是就数据分析来说，已经很能说明问题了。

Even a small amount of environmental wobbliness seems to promote a desire for an emotional rock to cling to.

即使只是环境中存在一点点的不稳定因素似乎都会让人们产生赶快抓住一根感情稻草的冲动。

2020GRE阅读考试三招搞定相关文章：

★ 2020GRE填空题目答案及解析

★ 2020最新GRE填空题目答案及解析整合

★ GRE阅读6种常见错误选项形式类型讲解

★ 暑假新打算:三招搞定孩子的“暑假计划”