如何写出独一无二的GRE文章

如何写出独一无二的GRE文章?一起来学习一下吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

写出独一无二的GRE文章

1.在观点上要具有洞察力，要有自己的原创特色。

观点是GRE作文考试的核心内容，考察考生能否对一个issue进行深入分析与思考并最终提出一个有层次的观点。有了原创观点就不用担心雷同。我这样说也许有有点像让快饿死的人去吃肉粥。如果真的要借鉴范文观点，我建议应该尽可能做一些调整，以避免第二个雷区。或者干脆在文中讲明这个思路是借鉴了哪一本参考书的。美国人对真小人比对伪君子要宽容。

2.绝对不能照抄原文。

在语言上可以使用一些范文的句式，但是绝对不能照抄原文，而是要换掉一些关键词。或者如果要借用关键词，则必须使用别的句式。

3.在结构上可以采取声东击西的策略。

比如把北美范文用在120题的结构和破题策略用在210题上。

4.可以引用范文例证。

在例证方面，使用范文用过的例证没有问题，哪怕用那些被判雷同的例证也没问题。例证是人类的共同知识，谁都可以使用，关键是我们不能用和范文作者同样的思路和语言来诠释例证并展开类似的论证。

因此，越是耳熟能详的例证如牛顿与苹果树、爱迪生孵蛋，要写出原创的内容就越困难，雷同的危险就越大。

综上，要想根本避免GRE作文雷同情况发生，我们一方面可以在政策允许的范围内对范文进行合法、合理的使用，另一方面更要积极培养我们自己的独立思考能力，从根本上解决雷同问题，避免因雷同而被取消成绩。 这就需要考生有自己的思想、自己的例证和自己的语言，各位考生尽量不要照抄范文，而是自己来写。

以上就是为大家介绍的有关GRE写作的内容，参加GRE考试的考生，可以通过文章的整理，掌握这些GRE写作方法，希望能够对您的GRE考试有所帮助。

GRE issue写作优秀实例：教育之分数

题目：

"Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.

追求高分严重的限制了教育各阶段的学习质量。

正文：

“How is your examination?”, this may be a most frequently asked word among students and their custodians. Some people worry about that too much emphasis put on grades will do harm to the real quality of education. But in my eyes, pursuing for high grades do have much more benefits than its blemish.

First of all, it is competition for high grades that helps boost students’ ambition to grasp knowledge as firmly as possible in that thirst for success is everyone’s humanity.Just as the proverb goes, “No pains, no gains.” For getting a satisfying score, students have to prepare for and review their texts frequently, remember all the knowledge they have learned deep in mind, enlarge their learning if it is possible and so on,especially when examinations are coming. All these efforts, no matter what their aims are, will surely lead to a corresponding paying back. On the other hand, such pressure of competition will actuate teachers to improve their quality of education. For example,they should ameliorate their didactics to adapt the changeable needs of students, make their lessons more interesting and concise to attract pupils, and renewal their own knowledge and conception to keep up with the updating pace of young men. Thus with the exertion of the both sides, student’s pursuit of high grades is not such a bad thing.

Secondly, we are in a well-established competition system that no one can break away from it, so the earlier students have the competitive awareness and competitiveness,the more easily they can adapt to the intense life in the future. That is, from the first day one begins his/her process of socialization till the last day of his/her life, it is unavoidable to face with many challenges and contests such as attending record examination of universities, job hunting after graduation, promotion in companies,going after a beautiful girl, and so on. Thus to be a cogent competitor is of great necessity for one to make his/her own way, which reflected at present to students during their process of education is the ardent pursuing for high grades. I remember that General 巴顿used to say that the soldier who do not want to be a general is not a good soldier. Accordingly, in a sense, a students do not want to gain high grades is not a good student.

However, every coin has two sides. When students and teaching faculties are confined by the zealous pursuance of high grades, such figures seem to lose their original sense.Some faculties take grades as the only standard to evaluate a student neglecting other qualities of the same importance such as teamwork spirit, creativity, criticize spirit and so on, and as a feedback to their teachers, some students put all their attention to the textbooks with other knowledge, skills and abilities culture left behind, which lead to the strange phenomenon so called “ Having high scores but poor quality”, a great sarcasm towards modern educational system. Another mal-consequence of too much emphasis on competition is the forfeit of some belief. For example, stealing in examinations, a severe problem badgers many teachers, is in fact the lost of honesty and a dangerous trend for future.

To sum up, competition for high grades may compel students to grasp the knowledge automatically and firmly; help them establish competitive awareness, which may inspire them to improve their comprehensive quality for the better competitiveness. On the contrary, if such pursuit were not limited to a proper degree, it would lead some negative effects. Hence, the right attitude towards this question is to encourage students to study hard, absorb knowledge widely and compete equitably, only in such way can competition for high grades indeed upgrades the quality of learning at all levels of education.

GRE issue写作优秀实例：有效率的教育

题目：

Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."

教育只有被专门设计来满足每一个学生个人需求和兴趣的时候才是真正有效率的。

正文：

While I agree with the speaker that specifically-designed education for each individual may serve students better than the general education we adopt today, this kind of education may have some potential problems and even harms undermining its feasibility.

I concede that nowadays individualism is becoming more and more vital. People advocate and appreciate special characteristics and skills distinctive from those of others. The trend applies to both social lives and professional careers. With respect to one's vocation, specialization demands that talents with unique skills and abilities are the most distinguished ones, especially in such a competitive society like today. Every individual is competing with peers all around the world. If one receives mere general education, it is quite possible that he/she can only reach a mediocre level, never an eminent expert. With respect to school education, a specifically designed education is needed to dig out students' potentials, which would otherwise be masked by general education. It is especially so in high school, when students are prepared to choosing their future majors in university. Suppose a student with distinguished gifts in economics. With only a few economics courses in the high school curriculum, he/she may not discover his/her own gifts. Even if he/she realizes his/her interests in economics, no opportunnities of exploring more about economics are provided for him/her because there lacks special courses for those who want to learn more about economics. From the two respects above, I strongly hold a positive attitude towards specialized education which caters to individual needs.

Nevertheless, the concept of specific education has certain potential problems which prevent it from being feasible in a large scale. The problems are mainly embodied in three aspects. First, the technical feasibility of the concept is highly questionable. How can people devise a curriculum that is suitable to each student in the country? How does a school arrange those courses? How can teachers be able to deal with so many different needs and interests of each individual? As a matter of fact, under today's circumstances of general education, the supply of teachers is becoming less and less,while the demand for them is increasing. So, it's hard to imagine that, for so many students in the country and so many different needs and interests, the teachers can be capable of catering to all the students.

Secondly, too much emphasis on specific education may make students disregard the importance of general knowledge, therefore undermining the academic basis of students. Take high school education as an example, we encourage students to learn a wide range of basic disciplines, such as mathematics, literature, physics, chemistry, philosophy, to ensure that they absorb adequate knowledge from all different subjects. That guarantees them to have a relatively general background to explore their own potentials and develop their own interests. If a student interested in literature is encouraged to plunge into literature and overlook other subjects from high school,even if his/her individual interest is satisfied, it is harmful for his/her future development because of lack of logical and analytical training.

Finally, specifically-designed education sets up many obstacles in evaluating students.No unified criteria can be created if we adopt such an individualized educational mode. Then, it is quite a thorny problem for our educational institutions to devise examinations to select talents. How can we compare a student specializing in literature with another one who studies chemistry? How can we decide which ones are admitted to colleges and universities while others are not? Some people might argue that we can divide the college entrance examination into several parts, which respectively cater to different specializations of students. However, it is still too demanding and expensive. Thus it is rather infeasible. The most eclectic and effective way to combine specialization with generalization may be like today's education mode in which students learn a wide range of general knowledges in high school and study major subjects in university. As to developing individual interests and digging out individual potentials in high school, I recommend that those responsibilities be taken by parents or private tutors. Generally parents know best about their children's needs and they have every motivation to explore their children's potentials. It is far too burdensome and difficult for our public education institutions to take those responsibilities.

To sum up, I agree with the speaker insofar as that individual needs and interests of each student should be underscored and valued, but the public general education should remain the way it has been. Because public education has its inherent limitations, and thus we cannot require too much of it. I advocate that parents should pay more attention to the individual needs and interests of their children, and family tutoring may be a more effective way to developing students' individual interests.

如何写出独一无二的GRE文章相关文章：