GRE写作高频题资源解读

GRE写作高频题资源解读 ,高频作文其实没那么好用?这2个实用技巧值得一试,快来看看吧，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作高频题资源解读 高频作文其实没那么好用

GRE写作高频作文题为何受欢迎?

很多同学在备考GRE作文的时候，之所以对“高频”情有独钟，实际上思想根源还是希望能减少工作量，说得通俗一点，也就是还是抱有“投机取巧”的心理。这些同学的想法往往是：GRE官方的题库给出的200多道题太多了，看高频可以减低我的工作量(也就是不需要把200多道题目都看完)，如果在考试的时候遇到高频题目，而我正好写过的话，那么分数就是有保证的。或者，至少比写一篇完全没有看过的文章要强。如果我们把这些同学的看法当做一个论证的过程来找找其中的逻辑问题的话，大家就能明白为什么说“高频只是个传说了”。

从GRE作文论证结构角度看高频题作用

在这个论证过程中，同学首先假设了一个前提，就是“写一篇已经写过的文章得到高分的可能性大于写一篇没有写过的文章”。可是，我们考虑一下，如果本身这篇文章从一开始按照这个同学的分析思路，包括写作的语言就存在巨大问题的话，那么，即使是考试的时候照着抄一遍，分数也仍然会是很低的。因此，只有当你的写作思路正确，分析过程正确，语言表达正确这几个条件都满足的时候，对于题目的熟练程度，或者是否写过某个题目的作文，才会影响到最后的分数。当然，我们还同时忽略了考场上的临场状态的变化问题。

而反之，如果一个考生有正确的分析思路和写作思路，有比较好的语言表达能力，那其实考试的时候是否写过某个题目就变得不重要了，因为最终他的能力会很好地解决题目熟悉程度的问题。比如我们所熟悉的高考语文中进行的作文测试，我们实际上是完全不知道考试会出现什么题目的，我们平时练习的时候，也基本上不会考虑考试的时候是否会遇到同样的题目，但是最终，写作能力比较好，思维方式比较正确，知识面比较宽的同学往往会在作文中得到高分。

从这个角度来看，实际上在准备作文的过程中，练习的题目是否是高频并不重要，而重要的是，是否通过练习形成了正确的分析思路，写作思路，并且让语言的表达正确。

GRE写作高频题其实没那么好用

另外，很多人也认为“高频”题目在考试时被抽到的可能性更大，并且还有人会计算题目出现的概率。为了让大家都能看明白，我不会在这里建立一个模型来计算什么题目出现的概率较大，我们只考虑如下的一些问题。首先，ETS在从开放题库中抽取题目给考生的时候，是一种随机的选择方式，那么，每个题目被抽取到的概率是完全一样的。而现在并没有证据表明ETS在抽取题目的时候采用了任何优先级策略，所以我们不能对此作出主观假设。第二，从目前的高频统计方式来看，存在着很大的漏洞。

大家不妨计算一下每天有多少人去参加GRE的作文考试，一年下来又有多少人参加作文考试，其中在网上发布题目的人的比例有多少，而发布出来的题目被统计的又有多少。如果这些数据本身都没有确切值的话，那么统计的样本首先就是存在问题的。而“高频”的出现，很可能是“马太效应”的结果，即在很长一段时间里面，A题目被大多数人关注，于是成为了“高频”的一部分，于是，有人考到了这个题目，在网上发了帖子，那么这个题目的关注度继续上升。而那些“低频”的题目，即使有人发了，也没人去关注，但是很可能在一段时间后，某个“低频”的题目其实出现的频率很高了，但是却依然没有人去关注它。因此，要想得到科学的统计，必须有一个平台，来随时完整统计大多数人在考试中遇到的题目的情况，并且实时更新，才能得到较为准确的数据。

因此，在备考GRE作文的过程中，其实是否准备网络流传的“高频”题目并不重要，而重要的是，无论准备什么题目，都能有正确的思考路径和分析方法，并且能够用正确的语言来表达自己的想法。当系统化的思维方式和准确的语言表达习惯形成的时候，无论什么题目都没有问题。此外，如果希望消除题目熟练度的影响，大量阅读题目，并且写作提纲是必要的，其中也包括对题目的分析和简单的逻辑结构梳理。

以上就是小编为各位考生整理的关于合理对待GRE高频作文介绍，希望考生积极做好备考工作，及时调整好状态，争取在GRE写作考试中取得理想的成绩!

新GRE Issue写作范文透析

Issue

"People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does."

Sample Essay

Teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of "synergy", where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. But the idea that people work more productively in teams rather than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.

Regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. These people may evolve into the classic "Type A" personalities that work ferociously because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. Other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. For these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with other people limits their effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. Whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.

Some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. Obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. Organizational behavioral studies have shown that Asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with Western cultures. It could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.

Another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. Will the rewards be greater if the team works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? To the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. Individual goals may interfere with the group performance. Synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole "sum" but rather towards an individual reward. Productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.

Finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend upon the type of team that is organized. Is the group composed of equally contributing individuals? Does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? From a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. Personality types that work well together can prove to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.

Fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on the individuals themselves. The dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. Whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks effectively and efficiently.

观点陈述型作文/[题目]

“当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效。团队的协同工作需要相互合作，它比个人竞争更能激励人们。”

[范文正文]

总体而言，团队的协同工作自然能通过“增效作用”(Synergy)这一理念而带来更高程度的整体生产效率，因为在这里，整体大于个体相加之总和。然则，当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有成效"这一观念注定会产生巨大差异，取决于所组织起来的团队的类别，团队与个人所能获得的终极回报或激励，以及个人本身。

关于个人，有些人天生就具有获取成功的欲望，无论他们所面临的情形或任务是什么。这些人会演变为工作狂这一经典的“A类”人格，因为受到一股内心的热火所驱使，这股热火时刻告诉他们必须不停地“有所事事”，无论是作为个人抑或是作为团队的一分子。另一些人则可能希望不必那么多地介入社会，或者他们倾向于与其他人激烈竞争。对这些人而言，作为个人，他们工作起来会最富有成效，因为由于他们根本就不想成为任何团队的一部分，与他人合作便会限制他们的效率。这一思想倾向是否与生俱有，还是随着时间的推移而形成，这都无关紧要。这仅仅只是他们的一种生存状态，无论是动机还是回报，都无法在其内心深处激发起作为一个团队集体工作的欲望。

有些人，由于社会互动以及与他人协作去实现某种集体努力的欲望，而具有极强的动机。显然，这些个人在作为团队的一部分进行工作时，他们便会处在其最富有成效的状态。组织行为学研究表明，亚洲文化更有可能形成此类集体性行为，与那种常和西方文化联系在一起的较为个人主义的行为构成对比。这样，人们自然会认为，某些文化价值观可以决定人们是否作为个人还是作为团队的一部分工作起来最富有成效。

GRE考试写作经典范文：政治和生活

题目：

It is unfortunate but true that political decisions and activities affect all aspects of people's lives.

尽管很不幸，但是这却是真实存在的事实，政治决策和活动影响着人们生活的方方面面。

正文：

Human beings are social animal and therefore highly dependent on political activities.While the word unfortunate is not always applicable in all circumstances, we have to admit that political decisions and activities affect our lives in all aspects.

One should notice and avoid misinterpretation of the term "all" in this viewpoint, as it does not equal going to extreme but merely indicates what is going on. Those who misunderstand often argue that their fundamental right to decide when to sleep, what to eat, where to go on their own will has always been left to themselves and has nothing to do with what the president had said or signed. Yet this is not the case at all.The moment when we enjoy our sweet dream while jobless people are picking waste bottles on the street, when we choose cabbage to be our daily recipe only because we can not afford high beef consumption, when we are forced not to travel during the SARS outbreak, political decisions are pulling us around. Personal rights sometimes give way to political decisions no matter voluntarily or unwillingly. Needless to say, political decisions become much more influential when it comes to other issues.Everyday we are directed in an invisible yet powerful way, so powerful that in no aspect of our lives can we evade.

GRE写作高频题资源解读相关文章：